Feminists need men who protects them. They are lazy and weak minded, they don't want to take responsibility for their actions.
During the first world war, the suffragets (brittish feminists) would give men a white feather, if they didn't want to become soldiers. This was a symbol of cowardice. Being given one by a woman was the greatest shame. Even those who had been excused from military service after being wounded, or because of illness, would enlist after being handed a white feather.
This is a strong example of how feminists use men's view of honour for their selfish purposes.
Similar things can be observed online, when "loser men", alse called "betas" complain about women. A feminist will tell them to man up, and to accept an unattractive, lazy female in her 30s as a wife. They even go as far as saying "Are you gay?", despite feminism being generally supportive of the gay community.
If the males start talking about how they'd rather get a mailorder bride from asia, the feminists will turn to blatant racism, attacking asians. This again despite feminists being generally anti-racist.
These examples all show just how dependent feminists are on men to defend them. Without men standing up for feminism, they would not have any power at all.
For this reason, the /pol/ mentality of victimizing white women and excusing their promiscous behaviour, is actually the greatest enemy of /pol/.
The root of the problem lies in a messed up concept of honour, wanting to act as a medieval knight for the lady and protecting her. The hard truth here is probably that the /pol/lacks who fall for this have so little experience of women that they can't differ between the lady and the witch.
This way the concept of "honour" gets hijacked by feminists and used against men who are not supportive of feminism. The solution is simple, but seemingly impossible for the general /pol/ poster to accept: Post too long. Click here to view the full text.